The Summary:
v^2 = 2GM/R + 2E + WR^2
The constant W is the cosmological constant.
Note that the effect of the cosmological constant term grows with
R ->
expansion rate increases with time!
The cosmological term will dominate the density term (ignoring E/m)
when
W > 2GM/R^3 or W > (8Pi G/3) x density.
In this case, v is proportional to R, and we get exponential expansion:
R= R0 e^(Ht/t0)
Note that if W = -(8Pi G/3) x density, then if E=0 then v=0. This
was
Einstein's cosmological constant that allows a static universe.
If W > 0, then the cosmological constant term makes a universe that
is
older than a Universe with the same expansion rate with W=0.
If W is large enough, then the age problem can be remedied.
The Density of the Universe
The density of matter in the universe evolves as (1+z)^3
The density of radiation energy evolves as (1+z)^4
At a redshift of around 10^4, there was equal energy density in matter
and in radiation. Earlier than this, the universe was radiation
dominated.
The temperature of the Universe, as measured by the radiation
temperature, is also higher in the past:
T(z) = T0 ( 1 + z )
The Universe was hotter and denser in the past!
If we extrapolate this trend back far enough, we reach the point
when it
was infintely dense and infinitely hot. This is the Big Bang.
Cosmic Nucleosynthesis
Nuclear fusion in the early Universe is like an inside out star -
the
Univserse stars hot and ends cooler.
Only light elements can be fused in the low temperatures from 10^8
to a
few million K.
Cosmic nucleosynthesis is the competition between fusing together
and
breaking apart by high-energy photons.
Gaps in the stable elements at atomic numbers 5 and 8 restrict cosmic
nucleosynthesis to the elements hydrogen (deuterium), helium and
lithium
almost exclusively.
The heavy elements that we and the Earth are made of must have been
formed in stars, not the big bang.
The relative abundances of the nuclides are controlled by the relative
ratios of protons, neutrons and photons at the time of nucleosynthesis.
Gamow and Alpher calculated the current temperature T0 to be about
5 K.
Nucleosynthesis occured at a time of around 3 minutes after
the "Big
Bang".
The Microwave Background
This microwave background was discovered in 1965 by two physicists
at
Bell Labs, Penzias and Wilson.
Penzias and Wilson received the Nobel Prize in 1978 for their discovery.
They measured the microwave background temperature to be about 3
K and
was isotropic on the sky to better than 10%.
There is a dipole in the microwave background at the level of 10^-3
of T0
due to our velocity of 570 km/s.
Recently, anisotropy in the microwave background at the level of
10^-5 of
T0 has been discovered by ground, balloon, and satellite based
experiments. These variations were imprinted by density fluctuations
at
the time of recombination (z=1000).
The COBE satellite was launched in 1989 and measured T0=2.726 K,
and the
anisotropy on scales 10 degrees and above.
Particles and Antiparticles
Two photons of sufficient energy can create pairs of particles and
anti-particles.
To conserve quantum numbers, you need to create both a particle and
its
antiparticle (which has all quantum numbers like charge reversed)
The rest mass of the electron (and positron) is me = 9.11 x 10^-31
kg
and thus two photons of me c^2 each can create an electron-positron
pair.
The average photon energy is related to the temperature by E=kT.
Thus,
when kT=mc^2, particle-antiparticle pairs can be easily created
(and
subsequently destroyed).
Electron-positron pairs are created at temperatures above about 10^10
K
(times earlier than a few seconds)
Proton-antiproton pairs are created at temperatures above about 10^13
K
(10^-4 seconds and earlier)
The Cosmological Constant
We now revisit Einstein's cosmological constant by amending the energy
equation. Consider first the standard energy equation with kinetic
and
potential terms:
Now, we can add the cosmological constant term, not as a constant (kc^2
is
already a constant in this equation) but with an R^2 dependence so
it will
behave as a density:
Let us explore the possibilities in this modified energy equation. Note
that
Einstein used it to make a static universe by noting that if we ignore
the
curvature term kc^2 and if W = -(8Pi G/3) x density, then v=0 is the
solution,
and a static universe (with constant density) is possible. This is
what he
later called his greatest blunder since v was found to not be zero.
Note also
that if W is even slightly different than -(8Pi G/3) x density, then
we get a
nonzero v.
The implications of having a cosmological constant that is now greater
than the
density term means that the Unverse is older than if the Universe had
W=0. This
is because the Universe was expanding slower in the past when W was
on the
order of (8Pi G/3) x density. Thus, if W is large enough, then the
age problem
can be remedied. This one of the proposed solutions to the age problem,
and
allows a flat universe (k=0 determines the topology, not W) with a
moderate
H0=82, but does require a rather high value of W. There are some measurements
being done now that could rule this high a value of W out (these are
based on
the counts of things like gravitational lenses with redshift, looking
for a
pile-up when the universe was just changing from density to cosmological
constant dominated evolution.
The Density of the Universe
We have from the previous lecture the scaling of lengths with redshift
The Stefan-Boltzmann law is essentially a statement about the energy
density of
radiation. We can rephrase it as
Cosmic Nucleosynthesis
There must have been a time in the past when the Universe was hot enough
(like
the core of a star) for nuclear fusion to occur. Astrophysicists George
Gamow
and Ralph Alpher in 1948 showed that when T was around a million degrees,
protons and neutrons could fuse to form helium. However, nuclear fusion
in the
early Universe is like an inside out star - the Univserse stars hot
and ends
cooler. Fusion in a star stars cool as they contract onto the main
sequence,
then gets progressively hotter as heavier and heavier nuclei are "burned".
Because there are initially no heavy elements in the hotter earlier
phases of
the universe, fusion can only occur near the end when the temperatures
are low
enough to combine protons and neutrons to make deuterium, a nucleus
of "heavy
hydrogen":
The cosmic nucleosynthesis is a competition between the fusing together
and
breaking apart by high-energy photons:
Because nuclei in this chain are built by progressive addition of neutrons
and
protons, it is much like a ladder:
The relative abundances of the nuclides of hydrogen, deuterium, helium-3
and
helium-4, and lithium-6 and lithium-7 are controlled by the relative
ratios of
protons, neutrons and photons at the time of nucleosynthesis. The ratio
of
baryons (protons and neutrons) to photons at this time means a higher
fraction
of helium (and deuterium and lithium) in the Universe today. More neutrons
relative to protons changes the relative abundances of helium-3 versus
helium-4, and deuterium and lithium-7. Using the observed abundances
today
(though finding a cloud of gas that hasn't been contaminated by supernovae
ejecta is difficult) can pinpoint the time of nucleosynthesis. For
example, the
fact that the mass fraction of helium-4 is around 24% is an important
clue.
Gamow and Alpher used the best data at that time and deduced the redshift
and
temperature of nucleosynthesis. They showed that a consistent picture
for
early universe nucleosynthesis could be constructed, and furthermore
that the
heavy elements must have been processed in stars. Finally, they calculated
that the current temperature T0 of radiation in the Universe should
be about 5K.
Nucleosynthesis occured approximately 3 minutes after the "Big Bang",
or
projected point of infinite density and temperature. In the final lecture,
we
will discuss what likely occured during the first three minutes of
the
Universe. The Nobel-winning physicist Steven Weinberg wrote a wonderful
book
called "The First Three Minutes" which I strongly recommend.
The Microwave Background
The 5 K "cosmic background" predicted by Gamow and Alpher should be
seen as
microwaves, since from the blackbody formula for the wavelength of
maximum
emission:
As measured by Penzias and Wilson, the microwave background temperature
T0 is
nearly 3 K, and was seen to be isotropic to better than 10% over the
sky. Later
measurements improved on this: the COBE satellite launched in 1989
has measured
T0 = 2.726 K, and found intrinsic anisotropy only at one part in 10^5!
The
spectrum of the microwave background is a perfect blackbody to the
precision of
the measurement. The discovery of the microwave background in 1965
was a
vindication of the Big Bang model in that there almost certainly had
to be a
time when the Universe was hot, dense, and opaque to photons at the
redshift z
1000. The competing model at that time, the so-called steady-state
universe
where the expansion was compensated for by the continuous creation
of matter so
the same density could be maintained indefinitely (and an infinitely
old
universe), was thus discredited, though some stubborn adherents still
try and
tweak it so that it seems to work (though it smells of epicycles).
One of the prime missions of the COBE satellite was to measure the anisotropy
of the cosmic microwave background radiation - in other words, whether
the
temperature (brightness) of the radiation in different directions on
the sky is
different from the 2.726 K average. Changes in brightness of the radiation
reflect changes in the density of the Universe at the time of recombination
at
z = 1000. At this point the Universe was only about a million years
old, and
there were only very small variations in the matter and radiation density
that
would grow gravitationally over the course of 15 billion years to form
all the
galaxies and varied structures we see today! Here are some maps of
the sky (at
a wavelength of about 3mm) made by the COBE satellite in its 4-year
lifetime:
The upper panel shows a strong variation in the temperature (coded from
blue to
red, with blue cooler than the average and red hotter than the average)
from
one side of the sky to the other. This pattern is called a dipole and
is
simply due to the Doppler effect from our galaxy's (and thus the Earth's)
velocity of around 570 km/s (caused by the gravitational pull of the
Virgo
cluster and the so-called "Great Attractor"). The magnitude of this
dipole is
10^-3 of the T0. Q: How does this relate to v/c of the Earth's velocity?
The middle panel shows the variations after subtracting the dipole.
The bright
band across the center is radio emission from our galaxy. Note that
the map is
in galactic coordinates with the galactic center in the middle!
The bottom panel shows the microwave background with the dipole and
the galaxy
subtracted. Alot of the hot and cold spots are just instrumental noise,
but
some of these (the signal-to-noise ratio is about 2) are real fluctuation
in
the 2.7K background caused by very small density fluctuations at z=1000
when
the radiation was last scattered by the ionized Universe! The level
of the
fluctuations are around 10^-5 of the 2.726 K average background, very
tiny
indeed. Here is a better map of the cosmic microwave anisotropies from
the
COBE map:
The resolution of COBE was only around 7 degrees. This map has been
smoothed to
10 degrees. For more on the results from COBE see the COBE Home Page
at NASA.
On smaller angular scales, maps of the microwave background can be made
from
ground-based telescopes. My PhD thesis at Caltech was on observations
looking
for anisotropy on angular scales of 2' to 7' (arcmintues).
Particles and Antiparticles
We used Einstein's equation from special relativity E=mc^2 to calculate
the
energy converted from mass in nuclear reactions. It is allowed to convert
energy into mass also! Two photons of sufficient energy E can interact
to
create a particle and antiparticle of mass m=E/c^2 or less. Since photons
have
no charge and are not normal particles, conservation of quantum numbers
(like
charge, baryon number, and others more obscure) require that particles
be
created in pairs, along with an antiparticle (which has all quantum
numbers
reversed compared with the particle). You need two photons for momentum
conservation.
The rest mass of the electron is me = 9.11 x 10^-30 kg, and thus two
a photons
of energy E = me c^2 = 8.20 x 10^-13 J (511 keV) each or greater can
create an
electron-postitron pair! Likewise, the proton mass is mp = 1.67 x 10^-27
kg,
so two photons of energy 1.5 x 10^-10 J (938 MeV) each or more can
created
pairs of protons and antiprotons. Note that the particle and antiparticle
will
usually come back together in a short time, or encounter another of
its
anti-partners, and annhilate turning into energy (photons). (Note:
particle -
antiparticle annhiliation is a possible source of energy, assuming
you can find
antiparticles sitting around somewhere, and is perfectly efficient
in the sense
of E=mc^2. This should be familiar from "Star Trek" as their stated
source of
energy for the starship.)
The average energy of photons in a thermal radiation bath is about E=kT,
where
k is Boltzmann's constant (k = 1.38 x 10^-23 J/K). Thus, when the temperature
reaches T=mc^2/k then particle-antiparticles pair with masses m can
be created
(and destroyed) at will. For electrons, this will occur at temperatures
of
just under 10^10 K, which occur in the universe at a few seconds after
the big
bang. At times earlier than 1 second, therefore, the Universe was a
sea of
electrons and positrons being created and annhiliation spontaneously.
Likewise, when the Universe was just above 10^13 K, protons and antiprotons
could be created from the radiation, and thus earlier than 10^-4 seconds
after
the big bang the Universe also had a sea of protons and antiprotons
being
continuously created and destroyed.